In addition to the raunchiest faux-news segment in human history, the Sunday, May 17, 2014, edition of
HBO’s Last Week Tonight with
John Oliver swiped hard at public polling data
showing one in four Americans skeptical of anthropogenic climate change.“Who
gives a shit?” Oliver said of that particular Gallup poll’s findings. “You don’t need people’s opinion on
a fact. You might as well have a poll asking: ‘Which number is bigger, 15 or
5?’ or ‘Do owls exist?’ or ‘Are there hats?’ The debate on climate change ought
not to be whether or not it exists,” he continued. “It is what we should do
about. There is a mountain of research on this topic. The only accurate way to
report that one out of four Americans are skeptical of global warming is to
say, ‘A poll finds that one in four Americans are wrong about something,’” he
added. “Because a survey of thousands of scientific papers either took a
position on climate change found that 97 percent endorsed the positions that
humans are causing global warming.” And yet the public continually expresses
skepticism of the science, Oliver said, perhaps assisted by cable news’
insistence on depicting a one-on-one debate between a “skeptic” (or “some
dude”) and a global warming “believer,” most typically Bill Nye, the Science Guy. “If there has to be a
debate about the reality of climate change, and there doesn’t, then there is
only one mathematically fair way to do it,” he said before turning to Bill Nye
himself for a more “accurate” version of how the climate change debate should
occur.
Ninety-seven percent of scientists believe that
man-made climate change is occurring. Two percent of scientists say that they
do not know if it is man-made or a natural occurrence. Only one percent say
that there is no climate change or that there is but it is not man-made. The
challenge for the media is how to accurately reflect that consensus. Oliver
maintains one way not to do it is to give equal time to climate science
deniers. Unsurprisingly (yet tragically), that is the preferred strategy of
most of the television news sources. False balance is alive and practiced at
many news sources including CNN, Reuters, Bloomberg, and PBS. Oliver maintains that for every three scientists on
the news or on talk shows, ninety-seven scientists should also be present to
debate the three. That would be "fair and balanced", the slogan of
the Republican Party media propaganda mouthpiece, Rupert Murdoch's Fox News.
All scientists and media outlets should heed the “advice to climate
scientists on how to avoid being swift-boated,” from History professor Juan Cole: “Any
broadcast that pits a climate change skeptic against a serious climate
scientist is automatically a win for the skeptic, since a false position is
being given equal time and legitimacy.”
John Oliver 's statements and graphic display of what a ninety-seven to
three might look like are on YouTube and various other sources. The video has
gone viral and has reach about three million people since the broadcast.
*
On May 29, 2014, Republican Congressman and Speaker of the U.S. House of
Representatives wade into the debate about climate change because the Obama
administration is preparing to roll out new regulations on greenhouse gas
emissions from existing power plants on June 2. You have to understand that
when President Obama is for anything, the Republicans are automatically against
it. So, although the rules have not yet been made public, they are
already drawing criticism from congressional Republicans. In addition, many of
the rules' opponents are not even convinced that the issue of climate change even
needs to be address. These are many of the same people who do not believe in
evolution, women's equality, etc.
The Republican-led House Science
Committee (which does not believe in
science) is holding a hearing on Thursday morning , June 5. The Republicans are already questioning the
most recent scientific reports on climate change.
A reporter asked House Speaker John
Boehner at the Republican leadership press conference if, given his stated
concerns about new regulations, "Are there steps you would support to take
action against climate change, and do you think that's a problem?" Boehner's
response didn't exactly answer the question. He said, "Well, listen. I'm
not qualified to debate the science over climate change. But, I am astute
enough to understand that every proposal that has come out of this
administration to deal with climate change involves hurting our economy and
killing American jobs," said Boehner. "That can't be the prescription
for dealing with changes in our climate."
The speaker's low estimation of his
grasp of the science has not prevented him in the past from casting doubt on
the idea that climate change is a problem that can be attributed to human
activity, and particularly the burning of fossil fuels.
In
2009, ABC's George Stephanopoulos asked Boehner what the Republican plan to deal with
carbon emissions would be, and Boehner dismissed the concern. "George, the idea that carbon dioxide is a
carcinogen that is harmful to our environment is almost comical," said
Boehner. "Every time we exhale, we exhale carbon dioxide. Every cow in the
world, you know, when they do what they do, you've got more carbon
dioxide." He went on to suggest, though, that Republicans would come up with a plan.
In
2012, without then having offered any such plan, he told USA Today,
"I don't think there's any doubt that we've had climate change over the
last 100 years. What has initiated it,
though, has sparked a debate that's gone on now for the last 10 years ... I
don't think we're any closer to the answer than we were 10 years ago."